Posted on 05/25/2005 3:41:22 AM PDT by billorites
That's okay. They're all mine anyway.
The creationists fondness for gaps in the fossil record is a metaphor for their love of gaps in knowledge generally. Gaps, by default, are filled by God. You dont know how the nerve impulse works? Good! You dont understand how memories are laid down in the brain? Excellent! Is photosynthesis a bafflingly complex process? Wonderful! Please dont go to work on the problem, just give up, and appeal to God. Dear scientist, dont work on your mysteries. Bring us your mysteries for we can use them. Dont squander precious ignorance by researching it away. Ignorance is Gods gift to Kansas.I'll throw in my two cents. What he does not address is how creationists literally bludgeon with their own abismal ignorance (usually of science and/or logic but in some cases even history). Militant ignorance. The most relentlessly and militantly misinformed arguments around come from the creation/ID camp.
cute. factually erroneous, but from you that is no surprise.
Nor is the fact that you neglected either to refute the analysis to which you replied or show the grace to admit you just got #wn3d.
Instead, true to your long-established form, you oozed out from beneath the anvil with the following:
I've debated you before Prout, you ended up crawling off mumbling about Downs Syndrome not being a mutation.
I have forgotten the technical name for this form of argumentative deflection. PH, VR... what is the above dodge called?
and of seven.
BTW, you're projecting here. You're anonymous. I'm not. You're the coward.
and a gold mine they are, too.
Wonderfully scientific.
I don't have a problem with evolution. I have a problem with guys like you who exhibit faux concern for conservatism on the evo threads and never show their face on the threads concerning conservatism having to do with conservtaism and the constitution.
501 / 3 = 167.
501 / 7 = 71.57142857.
;)
That answers my question on what night it is.
I'm unsure exactly when and how stellar parallaxes were first observed, but my recollection is that it was not until the 19th century. That would've been very close to the invention of early photography so that may very well have been the prerequisite. Hmm..
I didn't give you advice. I made an observation.
The guy is projecting, and it ain't pretty.
If you want to see ad hominem, just look at Retros posts, he's an expert.
exactly! it's PRIME, baby!
You'd be surprised what threads we appear on. Do a search on Poster and plug in any of our names.
Right, in OZ.
You're anonymous.
No, I post under my real name. My first names John, presumably your's is Vade right?.
I'm not.
Yes, you are, you post using an pseudonym.
You're the coward.
:-}
"his views" do not equate to the points he raised in this article.
"criticism" requires address to the points raised in the subject matter at hand.
ad hominem dismissal does not equate to criticism.
OK, gotcha.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.