Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Creationism: God's gift to the ignorant (Religion bashing alert)
Times Online UK ^ | May 21, 2005 | Richard Dawkins

Posted on 05/25/2005 3:41:22 AM PDT by billorites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 2,661-2,678 next last
To: bluepistolero
11 But Christ came as High Priest of the good things to come, F36 with the greater and more perfect tabernacle not made with hands, that is, not of this creation. 12 Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His own blood He entered the Most Holy Place once for all, having obtained eternal redemption.

His own body.

1,661 posted on 05/28/2005 1:55:37 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1658 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yes, but isn't it a fact, that the bigger they grow, the more likely they are to collapse? Where have all the churches, so swelled with members, in the 1950's gone? Where are these mega-churches of today, headed for? They will break up and disappear, or some sects will remain. Corruption seems to be built in to them. And if that is so, then they must not have been founded on the true rock.


1,662 posted on 05/28/2005 1:56:24 PM PDT by bluepistolero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1659 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Truly not defeated, but does that mean they have to have a member still living on the earth? I think they're all waiting in heaven now.


1,663 posted on 05/28/2005 1:56:41 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1650 | View Replies]

To: xzins
the greater and more perfect tabernacle

Well, yes, Christ is greater and more perfect, yet we are one as well, especially if he indwells.

1,664 posted on 05/28/2005 1:58:56 PM PDT by bluepistolero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1661 | View Replies]

To: bluepistolero

You raise an interesting subject that I've pondered, and again it centers on the type-churches in Revelation. One wonders if in addition to being types, if they also might be stages of a church....possible routes they might take??

Which ties into your concern that the flourishing bodies of yesteryear have seemed to collapse in our day, and that the flourishing of today might well repeat that process.....those stages.


1,665 posted on 05/28/2005 2:00:10 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1662 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; AntiGuv; AndrewC; HiTech RedNeck; betty boop; xzins
I’m baaack! Jeepers, y’all have been busy…

The original definition from the discover.org website:

Intelligent Design holds that ” certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.”

My last definition (#1546):

Intelligent Design: An hypothesis wherein certain features of life v non-life/death in nature is best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

The latest from AntiGuv and PatrickHenry:

The Intelligent Design Hypothesis: Certain biological features or processes that are otherwise inexplicable may be explained by an intelligent cause, rather than by an undirected process such as natural selection. .

AndrewC, your objection at 1558 is very important. You said:

Just so stories about undirected processes can explain anything, just not plausibly

What has been omitted in our redefinitions is the word “best”. In other words, many explanations may be offered but all explanations are not equally plausible. The intelligent design hypothesis claims the “best” explanation for certain features.

HiTechRedNeck, I am assured that the use of the word “given” as a substitute for “certain” does not limit the intelligent design hypothesis to current knowledge and conversely would require mention of at least some for any particular assertion of the intelligent design hypothesis.

PatrickHenry and AntiGuv, I’m going to fast forward through your discussion to your last suggested rewording:

The Intelligent Design Hypothesis: Certain biological features or processes that are otherwise inexplicable may be explained by an intelligent cause, rather than by an undirected process such as natural selection. .

I like the word “certain” but object to the phrase “biological features or processes” because we need to make a “cut” between life and non-life/death.

Considerations such as form, geometry, mathematical structures, semiosis, autonomy, successful communication, complexity and intelligence are within the domain of intelligent design investigation – and the reference to “biological features or processes” might inadvertently limit the debate to bio/chemistry.

The omission of the word “best” in this discussion in combination with the phrase “that are otherwise inexplicable” puts the bar above that which is stated by the fellows at discovery.org. IOW, they are not claiming that there are not other explanations, but that the best explanation is by an intelligent cause. I think your last wording was getting much closer, PatrickHenry!

I suggest amending and revising your last definition as follows:

Intelligent Design Hypothesis: Certain features of life v non-life may be best explained by an intelligent cause, rather than by an undirected process.

I omitted my original “/death in nature” and “such as natural selection” as unnecessary verbiage.

1,666 posted on 05/28/2005 2:01:32 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1655 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

see my #1665 for possible ways to view...in addition to your perspective which also has merit. Thanks.


1,667 posted on 05/28/2005 2:01:55 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1663 | View Replies]

To: bluepistolero

Like many terms in the bible there is room for multiple meanings of church. Body of believers. Gathering of Christians and non-Christians that either aren't evident or who are openly inquiring into the gospel. Many are called but not chosen. Called out = ekklesia. It might even be possible to escape the pollution of the world by knowing Jesus then get entangled again (wiser souls than I can debate whether that's an 'ypothetical).


1,668 posted on 05/28/2005 2:02:07 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1656 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Well, the letters to the churches in the book of revelation, is relevant today, for all the churches are the same, no matter where in time they exist. If the lamp is taken away from them, it is because they deserve it. The virgins who trim their lamps are advised to be somewhere else.


1,669 posted on 05/28/2005 2:03:32 PM PDT by bluepistolero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1665 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; AntiGuv; AndrewC; HiTech RedNeck

I'm not trying to wrench up the defining, but have you all previously agreed to what is meant by "intelligent." If so, can you ping me to it? Thanks.


1,670 posted on 05/28/2005 2:05:04 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Yes, Jesus speaks of that somewhere, sweeping out the house of demons, then they come back and are worse than before.


1,671 posted on 05/28/2005 2:05:42 PM PDT by bluepistolero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1668 | View Replies]

To: bluepistolero

And somehow, the virgins who have no oil are excluded. A caution worth listening to.


1,672 posted on 05/28/2005 2:07:08 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1669 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

I perceive two visions here about what Science is expected to do. One surveys the scene at each point in its inquiry and tries to make the most likely judgment about what's the case (to date, it's that I won't win the Powerball, unless I get a friend on the ball drawing team), the other takes an 'ypothesis and drills down to the bitter end before starting up with another (keep buying those Powerball tickets, I have an unbustable budget, and we'll see if I ever win before I die).


1,673 posted on 05/28/2005 2:09:42 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies]

To: xzins; AntiGuv; PatrickHenry
Thank you so much for your reply!

I'm not trying to wrench up the defining, but have you all previously agreed to what is meant by "intelligent." If so, can you ping me to it? Thanks.

Most certainly I will ping you!

And yes, I expect we will need to define all the component concepts as well: intelligence, causation, life v non-life, undirected process.

1,674 posted on 05/28/2005 2:11:22 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1670 | View Replies]

To: xzins
LOLOL! I forgot to mention that we have not yet defined intelligence.
1,675 posted on 05/28/2005 2:12:35 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1674 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
The central Roman Church does believe it encompasses the western Roman Catholic world. Some western Roman Catholics disagree... well they aren't Roman Catholics at core if they do.

According to the Inquisition.

Someone has to win this tug of war over the definition of what a Roman Catholic is, and if push came to shove the smart money would be on Rome. They're an authoritarian, highly hierarchical church, and have been so ever since mixing up with the Roman emperor for the first time. Surprise. not

The catholic church has also spewed out dissident sects to become other religions a fair number of times. I'm not going to be overly surpised if the next half-century sees this happening again.

1,676 posted on 05/28/2005 2:12:59 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1647 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The analogy goes so far, and then we can see no more. Were the unwatchful virgins called upon later for some other reason? The story doesn't go past the big event of the coming of the bridegroom, who states he never knew them. Wiser souls than I can debate such details. I know I would not want to miss the second coming even if other chances follow.


1,677 posted on 05/28/2005 2:13:49 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1672 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; AntiGuv
The omission of the word “best” in this discussion in combination with the phrase “that are otherwise inexplicable” puts the bar above that which is stated by the fellows at discovery.org. IOW, they are not claiming that there are not other explanations, but that the best explanation is by an intelligent cause. I think your last wording was getting much closer, PatrickHenry!

My idea in using the expression "features or processes that are otherwise inexplicable" seems (at least to me) to cover the issue of "best." If there's no natural explanation, then the ID hypothesis is the only explanation that's left to explore.

If we do what the Discovery Institute does, and phrase it so that although there may be natural causes, the ID explanation is (somehow) judged to be "best," then we may as well amend all scientific theories to say: "... but to some, ID is preferable." I regard that as a giant step backwards.

1,678 posted on 05/28/2005 2:15:12 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; betty boop
LOLOL! What a precious metaphor, HiTechRedneck. Thank you!

The historical changes of how we "do" science is a fascinating subject sometimes visited by betty boop on these threads. I'm hoping she'll add some of her wisdom here.

IMHO, the emphasis on scientific materialism has caused tunnel vision in the United States as compared to former Soviet countries and Asia.

1,679 posted on 05/28/2005 2:17:13 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1673 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I have heard that the entry of the wise virgins might only temporarily exclude the unwise. Others see the unwise as not possessed of a true faith; therefore, not really Christian to begin with.


1,680 posted on 05/28/2005 2:18:28 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1677 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 2,661-2,678 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson