Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger
You, on the other hand, begin insisting on firearm training "at home," then claim "it's not necessary for everyone."

There's nothing contradictory about what I've said. Even at the most basic level - teaching children not to play with firearms - it is the parents' responsibility. Some will teach more than that, others won't and don't have to.

I see no difference in this than I do the schools teaching sex ed or character ed or driver's ed. It is not the role of the government to teach my children about sex, about manners or how to drive. And under these circumstances it is certainly not the role of the government to teach my children how to shoot.

48 posted on 05/25/2005 3:38:08 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: SittinYonder
Even at the most basic level - teaching children not to play with firearms - it is the parents' responsibility.

This is the fundamental flaw with your argument. Like proving a negative, you can't teach anyone NOT to do something: only TO do something. You can try to constantly reinforce prohibition, but you can't instruct to prohibit.

With half of all American households containing guns, it is simply irresponsible to consign the children of the non-gun owning homes to total ignorance of the subject.

50 posted on 05/25/2005 4:11:01 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson