Posted on 05/24/2005 6:21:48 PM PDT by wagglebee
We almost got there. We were on the verge of doing something that would have been the beginning of the end of judicial tyranny and the dictatorial rule of unelected men in black stomping all over the Constitution of the United States.
The Heritage Foundation put it this way: "America is edging towards a crisis in the role and operation of the federal courts – a crisis that threatens our constitutional democracy. Increasingly, we see judges ruling more on the basis of their personal opinions or their own particular view of the good society. In the process, courts regularly are ruling in ways that expand federal power and diminish the authority of the states and the freedom of citizens.
"As the courts have become more politicized, so has the judicial confirmation process. The political views of judges – or their perceived views – rather than their proven adherence to the rule of law is fast becoming the criterion for Senate confirmation. If we are to restore proper limits on government and protect our cherished freedoms, we must reverse this dangerous erosion of the proper role of the courts. To do this, the Administration must demand fidelity to the rule of law as the test of confirmation, the Senate must be pressed to change its rules to prevent obstructionists from holding up nominees, and the courts must be urged to enforce the federalism and limited government provisions of the Constitution."
That's what is at stake in the way the United States Senate deals with the president's judicial nominations.
The first step in dealing with this crisis is the appointment to the federal bench of jurists who will strictly adhere to the Constitution and interpret it in the sense that the Founders wrote it. The notion that it is a "living document," subject to change at the whim and caprice of un-elected judges who want it to reflect the customs and mores of the times as they discern them, is destructive of the Founders' original intent that was based on a sage understanding of the nature of man and the tendency of governments to overstep their bounds.
As Justice Antonin Scalia put it in a recent speech: "If you think aficionados of a living Constitution want to bring you flexibility, think again. You think the death penalty is a good idea? Persuade your fellow citizens to adopt it. You want a right to abortion? Persuade your fellow citizens and enact it. That's flexibility."
"Why in the world would you have it interpreted by nine lawyers?" he asked.
On Monday night Senator Bill Frist was poised to put through a change in Senate rules that would have prevented the Democrat minority from continuing to use the filibuster to prevent the Senate from voting aye or nay on the president's judicial nominees. He was confident he had the 51 votes needed to change the rules and put an end to the obstructionism of the minority party, which was employing the filibuster in a way in which it had never in over 220 years been used – to deny senators the right to vote on judicial nominees.
He never got the chance – he was stabbed in the back by seven members of his own party, and the best chance this nation had to restore the Constitution as the bedrock of this Republic was lost, at least for the time being.
Say what they may about saving the Senate's cherished traditions of civility and mutual respect, what these seven so-called Republicans did was to hand Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid the sweetest of victories.
And how did he respond? Was it in the hallowed civility the dissident Republicans so cherished?
Hell no, it wasn't. It was in Reid's thuggish boast that "We have sent President George Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and the radical right of the Republican Party an undeniable message ... the abuse of power will not be tolerated."
Note the "we." It obviously includes seven new recruits to his cause – seven Republicans who, if they had a shred of decency, would adopt the Judas solution: Find a tree, throw a rope over the lowest limb, put the noose around their necks and swing to and fro in the breeze.
As some observers have suggested, it isn't over yet. In the so-called agreement there is nothing that would prevent Senator Frist from sticking to his guns. As Pat Buchanan told Don Imus this morning, if the Democrats attempt to filibuster nominees other than the three they agreed to allow to have up-or-down votes, there is nothing to prevent Frist from still going nuclear and seeking to enact the constitutional option.
And, said Pat, that would require John McCain and his gang of seven to vote with the Democrats and against their own president and his party as many as four times.
Picture that if you can: perpetual betrayal on nationwide TV.
So, in the end, it all comes down to Bill Frist. The good doctor has the scalpel in his hands ready to excise the malignancy growing on the federal judiciary. While it might be dangerous surgery, he has no option. He needs to turn his back on the people who stabbed him there and start cutting – now.
Then we'll see if the gang of seven prefers to allow the tumor to remain and to grow, or to get rid of it for good. And should they prove to be pro-cancer, well, there are a lot of trees handy on the Capitol grounds.
IMO, McCain is despicable in the extreme.
I wish I hadn't read this. I had just started to calm down.
Because the presidents don't pay attention to what they are doing, and typically rely on "friends" to suggest nominees. Take Souter, for instance (please). Bush 41 got his name from John Sunnunu and he's turned into a disaster.
The same might happen if there is a Supreme Court opening in the next year or so. Bush might very well name Alberto Gonzales, because he's a friend. And Gonzales will be a disaster.
I doubt that Bush has the guts to name a Janice Rogers Brown to the SC. She's the kind of Justice that we need. About nine of them.
Bingo. It'll be a cold day in hell before I give another nickle to the RNC while these backstabbers can benefit from it.
"I'd like to see any one of you freeper freaks make it through the POW experience mccain--or mclaim as you call him"
FYT, 572 other POW's were not abandoned returned in Feb 73.......and 2/3 of them did not sing to their captors at all.....McCain is one of the 1/3 who did.....and he himself admits it.
But then, there are those who were known alive in enemy hands and never were returned......McCain and kerry assured we would never learn their fate when they were Chair and Ranking member of the Senate Select Committee.
They are almost equally despicable
'I'd like to see any one of you freeper freaks make it through the POW experience mccain--or mclaim as you call him--did.'
Honor that service.
'here's to much more of what we saw yesterday... '
pound sand troll,
I plan to contribute as much as I can to whomever opposes these quislings, be they Republican OR Democrat.
Let's find out who suggested Thomas to Reagan, and see if he knows any more.
My only problem with her is that she has shown too much propensity to be an activist herself. She has said in many of her opinions that she wants to strike down minimum wage laws, 40 hour work week and other labor laws. Now, that's all well and good. But isn't that something that should be handled by our majority in Congress. I don't want the judiciary involved in my life at all (as I don't want the goverment at all).
Just because he "served his country" in the past doesn't give him a free pass to destroy the country today.
She has said those things in her speeches, not in her court opinions. Big difference. She follows the law as it is written, even if she disagrees with the law. That's the kind of judge that I want.
I fail to believe any are smart enough and I agree with what Buchanan said on Imus this a.m. Frist needs to say it was not his agreement--he runs the Senate (not McPain) and put them up for vote. When they filibuster, nuke 'em and make the 7 vote publically. Re-election will kill them.
Not a problem.
I will respect him, and tell him thank you, for his prior service to this country - for the both of us.
LVM
Et Tu, John?
You can't whine and live on your medals for life (like McPain and Kerry). Dole is the example I look at for a war Vet. He does not whine, he does not parade his past before us, in fact he does not believe he did much more than the other vets--he just is Bob Dole. Patriotic, loves his country and is true to his word. He is the vet I respect and thank from the bottom of my heart. He IS a TRUE HONORABLE hero!
It would be nice if the party had that authority, but it did not. That was very much in evidence years back when David Duke ran as a Republican very much against the wishes of the GOP, not only in the state but nationally. Unfortunately, parties have no teeth when it comes to telling someone they can't run as a republican.
He left his wife when she became disabled. Didn't he marry a woman with money who stole drugs out of packages being shipped overseas?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.