To: TGOGary
You have not been betrayed. The fact is that 3 nominees, previously filibustered and soon to be filibustered again, will not be filibustered. How is that a betrayal? It isn't. You're creating problems in your mind that don't exist in reality. The option to institute the Constitutional Solution still exists. Relax. I assure you the liberals are raving mad over this. That's the first sign that we should not be.
9 posted on
05/24/2005 8:20:25 AM PDT by
JCRoberts
(We're at war. You think we're going to win it with a bunch of fish-eaters...Denny Crane)
To: JCRoberts
And Neville Chamberlain thought Munich was a "victory". Meanwhile Hitler immediately started up plans for the invasion of Poland.
12 posted on
05/24/2005 8:21:40 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Flush Newsweek!)
To: JCRoberts
You're right on. The libs lost a lot more than we conservatives did. We got 3 judges. Better than none. And we will get more. The more I calm down over my immediate initial rage at the RINOs, the more I realize this will turn out a lot better for us than the libs like Boxer and Kennedy.
16 posted on
05/24/2005 8:25:00 AM PDT by
Ron in Acreage
(It's the borders stupid!)
To: JCRoberts
The fact is that 3 nominees, previously filibustered and soon to be filibustered again, will not be filibustered. How is that a betrayal? It isn't.I suggest the GOP and its diehard no-matter-what-happens-this-is-somehow-a-good-thing supporters rename themselves "The Crumbs from the Table" party.
To: JCRoberts
I hope you are right. Yes, I am still a little upset over it but I am willing to let everything unfold before making my final judgement. Thanks for trying to set my mind at ease.
19 posted on
05/24/2005 8:27:40 AM PDT by
TGOGary
(I would blow my brains out before ever wearing a blue beret.)
To: JCRoberts
You have not been betrayed.
We have 55 senators, we need 51 to get rid of the stupid filibuster rule. Then we need 51 to get ALL of our people approved and seated. THEN, we need 51 votes to get a ProLife judge on the Supreme Court.
We have been betrayed because now we cannot get ALL of our people approved and we CANNOT get a ProLife judge on the Supreme Court. Why, because the stupid Filibuster still exists.
The President needs to get involved and lead from the front on this. There is nothing more pressing than saving the lives of 3000 babies every single day.
50 posted on
05/24/2005 8:47:10 AM PDT by
TomasUSMC
(FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson