Replies

Mark didn't, as far as I know, write about this. I heard him on the radio tonight. He has a show on WABC radio, from 6:00 PM -8:00PM and he said more or less what I have been saying and he tore McCain to itsy bitsy pieces. The rest of the 7 dwarves were shredded as well.

You give yourself far too much credit! I never called you arrogant; your far worse than that. You're a supercilious prig, verbose, and an egotist.

Mark will NEVER take you by the hand and show you the error of your ways here, point by point. He'll just eviscerate you! :-)

Here's a helpful hint...don't pretend to be an "expert" on things you aren't one on and don't talk about things you really ( and I mean REALLY!) know about. That'll save a lot of bandwidth and your ego. LOL

Thanks. For now I'll have to take your word that his position is identical to yours, since I did not listen to his show.

Don't worry about my ego, I long since stopped caring.

and don't talk about things you really ( and I mean REALLY!) know about.

I presume you meant things I didn't know about. In this case I have read the constitution, and the agreement, and I have listened to hours of discussion by the participants in the agreement and political and legal pundits. I have then applied my own reasoning to that input, and rendered an opinion.

I never said I was an expert. But to eliminate any confusion: I am not an expert in constitutional law. I am not a lawyer, nor do I work in the legal profession. My views on the constitution are based on my ability to read and comprehend english.

Nice thing about FR: Anybody can go look at everything I have written here since I joined, and decide for themselves whether my reasoning seems to be grounded in fact, or is simply loopy.

I could be wrong about my opinion in this matter. I am stubborn enough that I won't change my position simply because others tell me that Mark Levin says different. I could be persuaded by a cogent argument as to what in this agreement is unconstitutional. That would also I think be more useful to the group then simply stating that "Mark Levin Said So".

I've never been one to accept arguments by authority. Even when the Doctor tells me something, I ask for an explanation, and do my own research.

I never called you arrogant; your far worse than that. You're a supercilious prig, verbose, and an egotist.

I am egotistical. I also am overly verbose. I rarely use 50 words when 100 will do :->

However, I reject the label "supercilious prig", and in my non-expert opinion anybody who knows what those words mean would not apply them to me in this exchange.

supercilious: Feeling or showing haughty disdain

prig: A person who demonstrates an exaggerated conformity or propriety, especially in an irritatingly arrogant or smug manner.