Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: defconw

"Frist will pull the trigger if the Dems filibuster at any time!"

Can someone clear this up for me... I just heard Frist say this on Hannity, yet if I understood what Rush was saying earlier the agreement says that the Constitutional Option CANNOT be used again for a year and half.


2,012 posted on 05/24/2005 2:22:45 PM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2001 | View Replies ]


To: Pravious


Not true.


2,019 posted on 05/24/2005 2:24:52 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious
the agreement says that the Constitutional Option CANNOT be used again for a year and half.

Frist never agreed to that. It's his call, not the 7 dwarfs (although they'll probably vote with the dems if he calls it.)

2,020 posted on 05/24/2005 2:25:09 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious

Frist never agreed to that BS! The option is on the table!


2,021 posted on 05/24/2005 2:25:16 PM PDT by defconw ( Vote Up or Down on Janice Brown!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious

Accrding to the deal the RINO's signed which has no legal bearing but would be a bad PR move to break, as if what they did isn't already bad PR, they cannot bring it up in this session of Congress. But Frist and the 48 didn't sign this damn agreement. frist is the majority leader and he can bring it whenever he wants to if they try to filibuster.


2,023 posted on 05/24/2005 2:25:56 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious
Direct quote from Frist:

"So make no mistake, the Constitutional Option remains on the table. If the minority again acts in bad faith--if they resume their campaign of mindless judicial obstruction--I will NOT hesitate to call it to a vote."

2,032 posted on 05/24/2005 2:28:27 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious
I just heard Frist say this on Hannity, yet if I understood what Rush was saying earlier the agreement says that the Constitutional Option CANNOT be used again for a year and half.

That's if the seven weasels live up to the MOU. If they do, and they vote against Frist on a Party control vote, then they will be toast for the next year-and-a-half. Remember, they haven't just riled up Frist, but 47 other Republican Senators.

My guess is Graham and DeWanker will melt under the Party pressure if push comes to shove. However, you never can tell with weasels.

Say, that's a godd name for the 14 Senators -- the NEW "Axis of Weasels".

2,037 posted on 05/24/2005 2:29:56 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Forget Blackwell for Governor! Blackwell for Senate '06!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious
I just heard Frist say this on Hannity, yet if I understood what Rush was saying earlier the agreement says that the Constitutional Option CANNOT be used again for a year and half.

ONLY the 7 Dwarfs signed that agreement ..

Frist and the other 48 Senators did not take part in that agreement

The Constitutional Option IS still on the table

2,038 posted on 05/24/2005 2:30:25 PM PDT by Mo1 (Hey GOP ---- Not one Dime till Republicans grow a Spine !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious

I think Rush meant the weasels agreed to a year and a half, but Frist is not part of this agreement.

I hope this agreement is in the shredder (along with the weasels' careers) very soon.


2,043 posted on 05/24/2005 2:31:46 PM PDT by soloNYer (McCain's Moderates= people who don't know who their own representatives are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious; Cboldt

Cbodlt, are we wrong in thinking that Frist basically said this agreement is not binding. Therefore this idea that the Constitutional option cannot be implemented for a year and a half is wrong?

In essence, this agreement between the 14 Fools is an agreement between themselves?


2,044 posted on 05/24/2005 2:32:13 PM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious
Rush was saying earlier the agreement says that the Constitutional Option CANNOT be used again for a year and half.

Rush was wrong.

Some of us correctly pointed out last night (when many here were also asserting that same thing in error) that was incorrect and I believe posters listening to Rush said he later corrected the record.

2,195 posted on 05/24/2005 3:32:42 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: Pravious
Rush was saying earlier the agreement says that the Constitutional Option CANNOT be used again for a year and half.

That's what the agreement says alright. Or more properly that the slimy seven won't vote to change the rules, which is enough votes to prevent the rules from being changed. Thus the nuclear option is now a fizzle, not even that really more a dud, until the end of the 106th Congress.

2,413 posted on 05/24/2005 5:37:40 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson