Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarcusTulliusCicero
They will have to go on record voting against cloture, which means they will now have filibustered a judge and will have lost the ability to campaign saying that they never technically voted to filibuster

The agreement doesn't require the Republicans to vote against ANY cloture. The part about the 2 additional judges specifically says that nobody in the agreement is required to vote EITHER WAY on them. None of the republicans in the agreement are going to vote to support a filibuster on any of the nominees. The question to be answered is whether 5 of the 7 democrats will vote against cloture on Myers, not how the republicans vote.

1,819 posted on 05/24/2005 1:20:05 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1802 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Insightful.


1,828 posted on 05/24/2005 1:23:01 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1819 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Again, we'll see. If the Democrats weren't interested in filibustering the non-approved nominees then they would have been approved. So the implication is that they will be filibustered. Therefore, the compromise is like an emperor with no clothes and it solved nothing. If so, then we are right back where we started and then the RINOs have to either put up or shut up. If Frist is serious about up or down votes, then he needs to reassert his leadership (which this compromise is an end run around) can call for votes on the non-approved nominees. This compromise hinges on Frist not calling the vote.


1,855 posted on 05/24/2005 1:39:16 PM PDT by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1819 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson