Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

COPYING AND PASTING THIS FROM A SEPARATE THREAD FYI

In the last hour of the show, Lindsey Graham was on the Mike Gallagher show. Here is a synopsis of what he said

- I pretty much leave out the other side of the conversation since it is usually pretty clear what Mike said:


- It's tough to disagree with your friends...
- I'd like to give you my reasoning here...
[interrupted by Mike with clip played of Reid crowing: sent a message to Pres & Radical R's]
- He's just playing that to his base. The bottom line is that Reid and the D's lose the battle over these three that they most wanted to block. Pryor, Brown, Owens will be confirmed real soon.
- If filibusters are allowed, that will damage the judiciary. We had to end that. This is a chance to start over and reinstate the Senate tradition of parties working together. But ...
- I am a YES vote - a solid YES - for the Constitutional Option - if the D's resume filibustering.
- I predict all eight of these nominees will get back in the process, and that seven of those eight will be confirmed - but that one will not.
- This is all about the Supreme Court, though.
- The real big problem I had is "what happens if the Constitutional option failed?" There are FIVE SOLID NOs against the Constitutional option. There are 4 or 5 unknown. This was too close. Failure would be a disaster and really cause problems.
- Best is to get these conservative justices on the bench, and that will reframe the debate for the D's since these are not now "too extreme".
- [What if D's Filibuster USSC justices?] - D's said they would not filibuster unless "exceptional circumstances" - and that's not a wide open phrase - they aren't sinning this.
- Conservative justices will now make it through the judicial process.
- I will vote for the Constitutional option if they filibuster Supreme Court and so will at least one more of the 12.
- [lost momentum?] - Maybe - but don't forget that they have now put "Neanderthals" (Kennedy/ Reid's words) to be judges, and so these are not "too conservative" to be on the bench.
- This has been the hardest thing I've done ...
- If they filibuster, I'll fight back hard - I'll start over with the "nuclear option" - but we'll be in a far stronger position when we're discussing the Supreme Court justices with the public.
- I may be wrong and hope I'm not about all this - time will tell.


1,666 posted on 05/24/2005 12:13:00 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez wasn't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1662 | View Replies ]


To: hispanarepublicana
-This has been the hardest thing I've done ...

Oooooh, what I'm thinking...!

1,671 posted on 05/24/2005 12:14:40 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (red, red voter in a blue, blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana
This is a chance to start over and reinstate the Senate tradition of parties working together. But ...

How in the world can they keep trotting out that garbage? What does that mean? That they won't revisit this topic again until after the mid-terms? Till after Bush is out of office?

1,689 posted on 05/24/2005 12:33:09 PM PDT by johnb838 (Liberalism = Leninism.... Liberalism = Bolshevism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana

Graham- "It's tough to disagree with your friends..."

Note to Lindsey: There are no such things as "friends" in Washington.


1,714 posted on 05/24/2005 12:40:33 PM PDT by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson