Replies

To: You Dirty Rats

Doesn't seem so clear to me.

Looks like a knee jerk reaction.

Why on earth would they think the Dems would name all the nominees that would be cleared? Guess they didn't notice that none were prevented from a vote by this agreement.

Haven't they learned by now the Dems love to claim victory in the Jaws of Defeat? This is a clear loss for the Dems.

Saw Bush does call over a couple of Dims and says Clarance Thomas is my pick for Chief Justice. So what. He will still nominate him. They can not filibuster without breaking this agreement.

This is a Clear Democratic Loss. Did we win 100% of course not but then again we do not have even 50 conservative Senators. Maybe in 06 or 08 but not now. This is as good as it could have gotten.

2,021 posted on 05/23/2005 9:20:45 PM PDT by ImphClinton (Four More Years Go Bush)

Two more get tossed in addtion to Saad and Myers?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1409140/posts

2,026 posted on 05/23/2005 9:22:48 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)

2,045 posted on 05/23/2005 9:33:44 PM PDT by alwaysrepublican (When Passion Rules she never rules wisely)

They can not filibuster without breaking this agreement.

extreme circumstances are just around the corner. This agreement will breakdown this week.

2,071 posted on 05/23/2005 9:51:34 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794