To: OXENinFLA
I heard this weekend on a thread from a Republican fence sitter that he was hoping for a compromise but would vote for the "Constitutional Option" if the wording "extraordinary circumstances" wasn't taken out of the compromise.
65 posted on
05/23/2005 8:50:00 AM PDT by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
To: tobyhill
68 posted on
05/23/2005 8:50:31 AM PDT by
OXENinFLA
("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
To: tobyhill
if the wording "extraordinary circumstances" wasn't taken out of the compromise. That's not a compromise, that's the dems winning...
72 posted on
05/23/2005 8:51:38 AM PDT by
OXENinFLA
("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
To: tobyhill
IF "extraordinary circumstances" was in there that is.....
75 posted on
05/23/2005 8:52:12 AM PDT by
OXENinFLA
("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
To: tobyhill
"I heard this weekend on a thread from a Republican fence sitter that he was hoping for a compromise but would vote for the "Constitutional Option" if the wording "extraordinary circumstances" wasn't taken out of the compromise."
"Extroadinary Circumstances" was a negotiating throwaway by the Dems. They want to trade that term for a Justice. Not going to happen.
156 posted on
05/23/2005 9:21:16 AM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
