Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE Senate Filibuster Thread ~ Day 4
C-span ^ | 5-23-05 | US Senate

Posted on 05/23/2005 8:14:11 AM PDT by OXENinFLA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,341-1,3601,361-1,3801,381-1,400 ... 2,341-2,344 next last
To: Fudd Fan

Bookmark for when I get home


1,361 posted on 05/23/2005 3:04:35 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Time for Dr. Frist to shove a splinter up the 'Rats ass!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1359 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Well Byrd started off like he was going to cry then channeled a dozen or so dead senators. He then spoke of worms turning on turnip trucks or some such before Biden took the floor and spewed spittle around the room.

Later on Madame Rodham spoke for nearly ten minutes on something but couldn't hear with the mute button depressed.

They are now voting on whether the Sgt At Arms should call all senators to the floor. It seems to be passing unanimously.

After this, there supposedly will be debate till 9:00AM tomorrow, with a noontime vote on Judge Owens comfirmation or cloture.

There's a coven of Dem senators in a circle on the CSPAN2 screen right now. Dinner plans?

1,362 posted on 05/23/2005 3:04:57 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1342 | View Replies]

What Frist has to say will be important, but I think will be brief. He wants to frame the issue, yet again. DEMs need to have the issue framed often, because they are inclined to twist it up.

Noon is the time for cloture vote.

Debate scheduled for the night, as previously agreed by unanimous consent.

1,363 posted on 05/23/2005 3:05:18 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
I go by Hatch's voting record and his ratings by respected conservative groups. Hatch is no RINO by any accepted measure. He is one of the more conservative members of Congress. That said, I agree he talks to much and is too civil to the Democrats. Civility is a virtue. There is a time to be civil and a time to kick butt. Now is the time to kick butt. Besides, I think we can all agree that Hatch is a million times better than that the other Mormon Senator.
1,364 posted on 05/23/2005 3:05:21 PM PDT by mowkeka (They're not "insurgents." They're terrorists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1310 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
Byrd is squirreling away his Depends. He sees the handwriting in the snow, so to speak.
1,365 posted on 05/23/2005 3:05:35 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness (Quick, act casual. If they sense scorn and ridicule, they'll flee..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1357 | View Replies]

To: mowkeka

Call of the chair???


When are they coming back????


And who was the 1 that voted NO?


1,366 posted on 05/23/2005 3:06:11 PM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1364 | View Replies]

To: small voice in the wilderness

how in heaven's name is Sheets Byrd, just this side of a dirtnap, going to pull an allnighter?


1,367 posted on 05/23/2005 3:06:53 PM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1365 | View Replies]

To: cc2k
It seems to me that the "nuclear option" gives the Supreme Court to whichever party can win the Presidency with enough coat tails to get 50 or more Senate seats. I'm not entirely sure that's always a good thing.

The nuclear option has been SOP, just not codified, from 1789 the 1960s, and even that one wouldn't have turned out any differently because there were not enough votes for even a 50% + 1 vote for the nominee. Only since the second "W" term has the filibuster been used to keep nominees from getting a floor vote when there were clearly enough votes for the nominee.

Since the rules allow for the Byrd option, the Dims would just invoke it should they wish to put She-who-will-be-obeyed onto the Supreme Court if they were to gain the Senate majority before SWWBO becomes too old for the nomination.

1,368 posted on 05/23/2005 3:07:05 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1323 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

It wasn't Byrd. He voted aye.


1,369 posted on 05/23/2005 3:07:09 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1366 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

The cspan dude said it was a "short break" Dinner??


1,370 posted on 05/23/2005 3:07:42 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry ("Harry Reid in stripes, I kinda like that image." -Tagline courtesy of DFU. Thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1366 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
I was a the last all-nighter in November 2004. Very few Dems had to stay in the chamber (only one required IIRC).

And for those who think Hatch is a RINO (on judges), they should have seen him fighting all night on this issue.

1,371 posted on 05/23/2005 3:08:53 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1367 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt; All

As I understand it.Senate is in recess, if anyone wants to talk all night, the chair will return...Cloture vote will be at noon tomorrow..if, as expected, it fails, then Senate recesses for caucus meetings..will return at about 3PM for the nuclear option...We're gonna have a loooooooong thread tomorrow..


1,372 posted on 05/23/2005 3:09:03 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1363 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

90-1 Quorum is present. (but 9 senators not present/voting) Cloture vote is around noon tomorrow. Senate stands in recess subject to call of the chair. Supper break I imagine.


1,373 posted on 05/23/2005 3:10:49 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1372 | View Replies]

To: All

I had to step out what the heck is going on?


1,374 posted on 05/23/2005 3:11:30 PM PDT by defconw ( Vote Up or Down on Janice Brown!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1373 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

Watching Brit's show reviewing the latest decision from the Supreme Court and it just re-inforces my opinion that any GOP Senator that thinks they survive breaking the Party on this issue is delusional. Ditto any red state Dem that thinks they survive by engaging in 'compromise' talks are voting no.


1,375 posted on 05/23/2005 3:11:31 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1370 | View Replies]

To: mowkeka
the other Mormon Senator.

I agree. I presume you mean Harry Reid. There are other Mormon senators besides Reid and Hatch. Robert Bennett, R-Utah; Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and Gordon Smith, R-Ore are Mormons.

1,376 posted on 05/23/2005 3:11:34 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1364 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

"I come back from lunch and who do I see? She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named!"

I saw an undertone in her speech.

What she said: getting rid of the filibuster would eliminate checks-and-balances against any President.

What she meant: there'll sure be hell to pay if me and Billy trick the American people into electing us again.


1,377 posted on 05/23/2005 3:12:59 PM PDT by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1225 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

It would be interesting to compare the percentage of Reagan appointees five years after his presidency with Clinton's present percentage. That would give some perspective.


1,378 posted on 05/23/2005 3:13:03 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1359 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

FWIW, I think few senators will speak tonite...


1,379 posted on 05/23/2005 3:13:17 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1373 | View Replies]

The recess is a chance for the DEMs to give unanimous consent to vote on the nominee. Likely won't happen, but would make for some high drama. If they emerge from the recess and announce a unanimous consent agreement (which would include voting on at least the nominees that are now on the Executive calendar), the Constitutional Nuclear Byrd Option (CNB Option, for short), will be deferred.
... a "live quorum" call stands in contrast to the those used to delay or suspend the Senate' floor proceedings; here Senators names are called more quickly. The Senate's rules require that live quorum calls occur immediately before a cloture vote or before the Senate acts on a unanimous consent agreeement to set a date and time for voting on whether to pass a bill or joint resolution. Also, the Senate Majority leader occasionally suggests the absence of a quorum and announces a live quorum call because he wishes to bring the Senators to the floor. At the end of a live quorum call, if a majority of the Senators have responded, the Senate resumes its official business.

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/votes/senvotehelp.html


1,380 posted on 05/23/2005 3:13:32 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,341-1,3601,361-1,3801,381-1,400 ... 2,341-2,344 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson