Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE Senate Filibuster Thread ~ Day 4
C-span ^ | 5-23-05 | US Senate

Posted on 05/23/2005 8:14:11 AM PDT by OXENinFLA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 2,341-2,344 next last
To: Milhous

Orrin Hatch is up now, taking Byrdbrain to school.


1,041 posted on 05/23/2005 1:21:16 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Carnac: A siren, a baby and a liberal. Answer: Name three things that whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1037 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Following the Byrd rule he used four times as majority leader. LOL


1,042 posted on 05/23/2005 1:21:47 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1040 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

I just wish he'd call it the "turnip truck rules"


1,043 posted on 05/23/2005 1:22:31 PM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1042 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
He's so in love........she's so generous...her life force is amazing...and she's my woman...and I don't play games....

Thanks for the report from Lala land. I wonder if they take themselves seriously...her life force...good grief.

1,044 posted on 05/23/2005 1:22:50 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1036 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

The Republicans should serve turnips tomorrow when the vote is taken.


1,045 posted on 05/23/2005 1:24:13 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1043 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Comic relief


1,046 posted on 05/23/2005 1:24:17 PM PDT by YaYa123 (@Silly Stuff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1044 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
Hey Hatch dont bring up the Dems total hypocrisy. That just isnt nice from a right wing radical.
1,047 posted on 05/23/2005 1:24:40 PM PDT by badgerbengal (close the border and open fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1042 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

He is nailing the DemonicRats....


1,048 posted on 05/23/2005 1:25:12 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

Laughing her hooooohaw off at ByrdBarns?

That could take some CONSIDERABLE LAUGHING!


1,049 posted on 05/23/2005 1:26:51 PM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
He is nailing the DemonicRats....

I'd say that where he stands is pretty clear...

1,050 posted on 05/23/2005 1:26:56 PM PDT by easonc52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

BYRD BARNS losing his mind?

Thought he sold that to the puppet masters for booze or was it niggahs to whip? decades ago.


1,051 posted on 05/23/2005 1:28:16 PM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies]

To: easonc52

Filibusters meant to avoid debate and consent.

Senator Hatch, wonderful job so far!


1,052 posted on 05/23/2005 1:29:07 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1050 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Are yellow and blue the official colors of Senate charts?


1,053 posted on 05/23/2005 1:29:18 PM PDT by badgerbengal (close the border and open fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54

BOXERFACE PERFORMS????

I thought she just lied there and whined.


1,054 posted on 05/23/2005 1:29:53 PM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
LBJ in 1965-67 had a 67-33 Senate majority. From 1967-69, it was 64-36. PLUS, he could make any United States Senator sit up and bark like a dog.

Easy to do with those majorities; not so easy at 55-44-1 when six or seven of the 55 are wobbly.

1,055 posted on 05/23/2005 1:31:11 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Time for Dr. Frist to shove a splinter up the 'Rats ass!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 988 | View Replies]

Anybody have a summary of the "Byrd Option" examples that Hatch cited? My first impression is that they are "weak" in that they represent lesser changes to procedural/praliamentary hurdles than changing the cloture hurdle represents.

One example was the "bundling" of a motion to enter executive session (which is not debatable) with a motion to proceed to a certain nominee (which could, before, be opposed by an objection). By bundling the move to executive session and the choice of nominee, Byrd avoided the stalling tactic of objecting to proceed on the nominee (an "all or nothing" objection, or at least one as to timing of taking up the nominee).

Are these examples all cited in the Gupta and Gold article?

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Gold_Gupta_JLPP_article.pdf

1,056 posted on 05/23/2005 1:31:16 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Am very inclined to agree with you on this.

Professional traitorous pols are a disgrace to humanity as well as the nation.


1,057 posted on 05/23/2005 1:31:52 PM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

I agree, I think Hatch is doing very good.


1,058 posted on 05/23/2005 1:32:29 PM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1052 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Imagine that Jesus said to you during His 1000 years of Peace after Armageddon . . .

and said

We need a new Constitution for the USA to model for the rest of Creation.

What would you write?

Course, lots of things would be different then . . . with evil locked up etc. . . but then slated to be loosed for a bit of time at the end of the 1000 years . . . hmmmm


1,059 posted on 05/23/2005 1:33:10 PM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

From MSNBC:

"By Tom Curry
National affairs writer
MSNBC
Updated: 12:58 p.m. ET May 23, 2005WASHINGTON - Cots were brought into the Capitol Monday as Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist scheduled an all-night session stretching into Tuesday to dramatize the debate over President Bush’s judicial nominees and the filibusters that Democrats have used to block votes on 10 of them.



The Senate debated the nomination of appeals court hopeful Priscilla Owen for four days last week and is set to vote on a motion to end the Owen debate on Tuesday.

The vote has larger implications than the fate of one nominee — it will likely determine what could be the most consequential battle of Bush's presidency. At stake: Bush's ability to steer the courts in a more conservative direction.

Bush demands ‘up-or-down vote’
The president on Monday insisted anew that all of his judicial nominees receive a vote by the full Senate as a dozen lawmakers raced to avert a showdown that threatens to paralyze the chamber and Bush’s agenda.

“My job is to pick people who will interpret the Constitution, not use the bench from which to write laws,” Bush said from the White House. “And I expect them to get an up-or-down vote, that’s what I expect. And I think the American people expect that as well — people ought to have a fair hearing and they ought to get an up-or-down vote on the floor.”


1,060 posted on 05/23/2005 1:35:27 PM PDT by YaYa123 (@No-Doze.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1058 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 2,341-2,344 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson