To lib fanatics, debating is simply shouting and name-calling more than your conservative opponent can talk. Rush mops up callers daily, and always lets them make their point first for as long as they are coherent. They usually last about 15 seconds before they go hyperbolic.
Liberal doctrine has no basis in logic or fact, and has always been a historical failure where ever it is tried. Liberals are all either criminal (the leaders) or stupid (the followers). You can substitute the word "ignorant" for stupid above if it makes you feel better.
However, your view that "Liberal doctrine has no basis in logic or fact" begs the question: If Liberal doctrine has no basis in logic or fact, why would you need a skilled debater like Rush to defeat a liberals argument?
Instead, anyone with a 6th grade education could defeat such a doctrine in an argument thus Rush accomplishments and defeating liberal callers is rather trivial.
NO KIDDING! I witnessed a stomach-sickening verbal brawl just this morning between a Democrat and a Republican. I got into the middle of these two men. It was awful. The Democrat was saying very vile, hateful things; AS HIS BASIS for his opinion. Spit was flying from his mouth -- Not facts, not data. What a whirrled...