Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Girls' Dad Pulls Gun on Frat Boys
Manchester Union Leader ^ | 5/21/2005 | RILEY YATES and JODY RECORD

Posted on 05/21/2005 2:04:22 PM PDT by Poser

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-254 next last
To: Poser

Go dad!


121 posted on 05/21/2005 5:24:41 PM PDT by ArcadeQuarters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poser

I was incensed until I learned it was "frat boys."

Thought it was "fat boys."

Gotta update my eyeglass prescription.


122 posted on 05/21/2005 5:25:34 PM PDT by righttackle44 (The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: somniferum
The story does not indicate that they were held against their will.

They were at the point where their dad was surrounded to prevent them from going with him.

123 posted on 05/21/2005 5:25:59 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Poser
It is 16 in New Hampshire.

There is no consent if the person has been drinking.

124 posted on 05/21/2005 5:31:08 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Sterrins; Mad_Tom_Rackham

Still, kidnapping is a federal crime. The frat boys, the town, and their keystone cops would seem to me to be at some risk of some serious stuff here.


125 posted on 05/21/2005 5:31:54 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Poser
This statute doesn't support your position. Perhaps there is another that I can't find.

http://www.ageofconsent.com/newhampshire.htm

126 posted on 05/21/2005 5:33:16 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

No, the father burst in demanding to know who was hosting an underage drinking party. This is when the frat guys allegedly surrounded him- which I assume 99% of people would do when a raving lunatic they don't know confronts them.


127 posted on 05/21/2005 5:36:50 PM PDT by Krankor (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Melas
because I don't think Dad would have made it off campus in TX.

Actually there probably would have been some dead frat boys after that one. Texas fathers do not take lightly to their children being snatched.

128 posted on 05/21/2005 5:37:16 PM PDT by Centurion2000 ("THE REDNECK PROBLEM" ..... we prefer the term, "Agro-Americans")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
Even if another 17 year old took them to the party, the hosts were operating a dive and we really have to believe that state has laws against dives.

Whoever took them can be charged with kidnapping ~ doesn't matter if the kidnapper is a minor.

Now, the question comes up about what should the dad do next time this happens? Well, for one thing, he should NOT reveal that he's armed until he really needs to use his piece. Otherwise why bother with a "permit to carry a concealed weapon". We do "open carry" around here if we wish, but you lose the advantage of surprise every single time. Of course folks are always very polite around you!

129 posted on 05/21/2005 5:37:20 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Nov3

Not sure why the dad would be "dead meat". He said he had a permit for the weapon. There's no reason to not believe him.


130 posted on 05/21/2005 5:39:20 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
I assume 99% of people would do when a raving lunatic they don't know confronts them.

Don't you know what happens when you assume? 99% of people would probably ask him to leave -- not surround him and prevent him from doing so.

131 posted on 05/21/2005 5:40:16 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Poser

This particular fraternity is described as one not recognized by the University. I'm guessing it's not on or adjacent to University property, so the gun restrictions wouldn't apply.


132 posted on 05/21/2005 5:41:26 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

This is N'ampshire, not UK.


133 posted on 05/21/2005 5:42:44 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Poser

GOOD dad!!


134 posted on 05/21/2005 5:42:57 PM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

See #46.


135 posted on 05/21/2005 5:44:10 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Wait a minute. Giving someone a ride to a party- even a dive, and then refusing to give them a ride back is kidnapping?


136 posted on 05/21/2005 5:53:31 PM PDT by Krankor (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

http://www.ageofconsent.com/newhampshire.htm

Yup. That's where my quote came from. It says the age of consent is 16 unless you are the boss, guardian or jailer. Frat boys are none-of-the-above so 16 should apply.


137 posted on 05/21/2005 5:54:04 PM PDT by Poser (Joining Belly Girl in the Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

One good thing about the illegal aliens swarming through the country is that most of them really like guns. No doubt they will be able to prevail over the reluctance of existing anti-gun legislators to allow greater ownership of guns.


138 posted on 05/21/2005 5:54:53 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

Yes, you are holding them against their will if, in fact, you let them into the house!


139 posted on 05/21/2005 5:55:29 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Melas
He will need to move to Virginia where what he did is considered reasonable and proper, and lest you want to lose custody of your kids, REQUIRED.

He'd best move here before those yahoos up there try to put him on trial.

140 posted on 05/21/2005 5:57:13 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson