Posted on 05/21/2005 4:14:32 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
Quoting from the Introduction: "Those who engage in defending scientific rationality against the waves that buffet it from many directions would do well to be forearmed with the awarness that this is a battle that was lost once, with consequences that affected every aspect of civilization for a thousand years and more."
Perhaps the author really likes ancient studies. He makes good points though. Also, the book has lots of interesting information.
Thanks. If I run across it, I'll get it.
As many as the Detroit public libraries?
Now that you mention it, I guess he has been getting screwed.
To be fair, during the period the manuscript was recycled, there was little interest in preserving classic texts other than within religious orders. During the renaissance, when people like Petrarch began to acquire and translate ancient works, the most common place to find them was in churches and monasteries.
Little merit or concern for it's preservation may have been the result of another extant manuscript on hand. (Let's remember that this copy was copied from yet another copy). It is also plausible that had this been kept intact as a work of Archimedes, it would have been sold off to some minor historian and lost forever.
Wouldn't it be easier to go to Staples and pickup some copying paper? ;-)
"The Aztecs told the people if priests didn't rip out human hearts daily...Error is the natural state of mankind."
That's a hughly series error, for sure, but it is only one error.
I get the sense that if the Aztec cognosphere was composed of X percent truth, Y percent error, and Z times infinity ignorance, our modern cognosphere may be composed of (arbitrarily, solely to illustrate my point) 100X truth, 1,000Y error, and Z times infinity minus 99X ignorance.
That is, it seems to me that the percentage of error in our cognosphere today is disproportionately large, compared to past eras. We have scratched away at the surface of ignorance, adding mainly to our store of scientific knowledge, while at the same time accreting a huge load of ideas (primarily in non-scientific fields) that are just dead wrong.
|
|||
Gods |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
||
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.