Gimme a break. Do you really believe a person who owns kiddie porn and a random person who drinks water have an equal chances of committing the rape of a 5 year old? You're an idiot, a sickie, or someone oblivious to the concept of statistical probabilities.
Dead Corpse is none of what you describe.
now, a little refresher on the Rules here on FR:
Please: NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts.
get it? got it? good.
See, that's the problem with these discussions, we have no baseline about what porn we're talking about, or what porn is.
On the one hand, we have people in this thread who're obviously talking about porn as beautiful adults doing it on camera. An interest in that kind of thing isn't necessarily indiciative of an underlying pathology. Most people have a healthy sexual interest in beautiful people. It's normal.
On the other hand, you have people like yourself who're talking about things like kiddie porn when we talk about porn. Obviously, there is a difference here. There is an underlying pathology in the kiddie porn viewer. Most normal people have healthy sexual interests in adults, not children. The latter is a sign of aberant development.
In simple words, Playboy wasn't a hit from the word go because it was perverse. Playboy broke out like gangbusters because men have always liked naked women. It's just the way we are. To equate that with kiddy porn is the ultimate Carvillesque spin.