Maybe so, but to me it's unseemly for the Judiciary Chairman to be undecided at this late date, and then yell it out loud! What message does this send to the Dems? That there's still room for compromise? I thought Frist made it clear that time has run out on that.
Another Scottish Verdict?
My argument is not that Spectre is justified in behavior.
What I am stating is that Spectre is Spectre. It's pointless to fume over the man remaining true to self. My only interest is that he vote correctly and so far his argument, while being full of the usual Spectre-isms we expect, is making the case against the Filibuster.
People are overreacting (so far).