Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
That is NOT what Bush wants; he wants UP OR DOWN votes on ALL of them. Not some pack of 12 fools deciding for 88 other people.

Bush will get his UP OR DOWN vote but he won't get all of his judges confirmed.

A pack of 51 fools can decide to vote DOWN some of the judges in the UP OR DOWN vote. That's what this pack of 12 fools is deciding now. How many will they vote down.

The six RINO's can still say that they gave the president his UP OR DOWN vote. The six RINO's will jointly decide how many of the judges they can vote against...and get away with it.

3,019 posted on 05/18/2005 10:19:02 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2987 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
A pack of 51 fools can decide to vote DOWN some of the judges in the UP OR DOWN vote. That's what this pack of 12 fools is deciding now. How many will they vote down.

The six RINO's can still say that they gave the president his UP OR DOWN vote. The six RINO's will jointly decide how many of the judges they can vote against...and get away with it.

I agree that this is the only form of "compromise" that is viable. Backroom deals to vote one way or another on a nominee. I don't like it, but I would "accept" it. I can't accept letting a minority of Senators cause inaction on a nominee before the entire Senate. Debate, then vote.

3,030 posted on 05/19/2005 4:47:31 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3019 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson