Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul

Thanks. However, I notice that in the article, with one exception, the allegations come from former detainees; not what I would consider reliable and trustworthy sources. The exception is a conveniently-anonymous former interrogator. None of these accounts could be said to carry anything close to the weight of a report appearing in Newsweek, ostensibly from a high-level military source.

Muslim allies, to the extent that they actually exist, could easily question or dismiss prior allegations. Their appearance in Newsweek, and the alleged source, brings them to a new level.


90 posted on 05/17/2005 4:41:37 PM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: william clark
I agree with your criticism of those sources.

However, I'm guessing that on the streets of Jalalabad, the former detainees have significantly greater credibility than sources inside the U.S. government. Not that they should, by any stretch - but in the minds of the rioters, the allegations coming from sources they considered credible were in no way new.

93 posted on 05/17/2005 5:45:11 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson