Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarketR

Yes, but you're missing my point. No one advertises in a magazine that has no subscribers.


42 posted on 05/17/2005 10:19:11 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Brilliant
You're missing my point. Newsweek has hundreds of thousands of subscribers worldwide. The impact of a few subscribers in negligible. They have, however, a finite number of major advertisers where a few thousand phone calls can have a tremendous impact! That is the point.

Loss of advertising dollars = angry board of directors and investors. Angry investors = loss of job by publisher and everyone else responsible. Gotta love a market economy! There are other places, (less controversial)for the advertisers to advertise their products and services. They will leave Newsweek with enough pressure, guaranteed!

44 posted on 05/17/2005 10:25:15 AM PDT by MarketR ("We are pioneers of the world; the advance-guard, sent on through the wilderness of untried things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant
Your point is very well taken. But it's far easier to scare off Newsweek's advertisers than to convince Newsweek's overwhelmingly liberal subscribers to stop buying the magazine.

In the wake of CBS' Rathergate, I closed my account with American Express (one of CBS' sponsors). They wrote me and phoned me to find out why.

51 posted on 05/17/2005 10:49:04 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson