Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek's nightmares (Newsweek slapped hard by Powerline)
Powerline ^

Posted on 05/15/2005 12:19:09 PM PDT by hipaatwo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last
To: Theo

If not for the story it wouldnt have happened , How can you not blame Newsweek? Placing the blame where it belongs doesnt have anything to do with 911. Isnt anyone else tired of these people writing stories for their sensationalism, to sell their sorry papers? How many died because the papers put Abu Gharib on the street, It was being handled in a perfectly capable manner before the papers decided to let the cat out of the bag. Journalism should require some type of responsibility. Freedom of speech isnt freedom to get people killed.


61 posted on 05/15/2005 2:12:17 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

...and these b*stards complain about bloggers!


62 posted on 05/15/2005 2:14:07 PM PDT by Pharmboy ("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anton
"Yea, CNN had a poll: Do you think Bush should have been told about the Cessna immediately."

Pinko Wolf Blitzer think so. It's a non-issue.

63 posted on 05/15/2005 2:14:31 PM PDT by demlosers (Rumsfeld: "We don't have an exit strategy, we have a victory strategy.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bvw
***By blaming Newsweek we do not hold those actually responsible to full account and we also by that eating our own -- gift aid and comfort to our enemies. That -- that is the greater treason.***

Scuse me but Newsweek and other msm are the ones eating our own. If you think Newsweek didn't have an agenda by publishing this - you need to come out of the dark. This was not just an "oopsie". Our enemies in the ME are rabid dogs and with this type of propaganda can turn their fellow ignorant citizens into packs of rabid dogs. Newsweek knew this and should be persecuted..

64 posted on 05/15/2005 2:14:39 PM PDT by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Newsweek got it wrong because they took a page out of the Dan Rather School of Journalism which states:

Rumors are as good as hard news if it's going to cause trouble for a Republican Administration:-)

65 posted on 05/15/2005 2:15:04 PM PDT by moondoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Well put!!!


66 posted on 05/15/2005 2:15:16 PM PDT by Txsleuth ( Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: anton
How about: Do you think Isakoff should be indicted for reckless homicide?

Ideally, Isakoff should be handed over to an Islamic court and tried for the deaths of any people that have died as a result of this story.

67 posted on 05/15/2005 2:16:03 PM PDT by awaken2spirit (When one fornicates with ignorance, the result of that union is chaos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
the riots started and spread across the country, fanned by extremists and unhappiness over the economy.

Say what?

68 posted on 05/15/2005 2:16:14 PM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming
persecuted

prosecuted.......well, maybe persecuted too. :o)

69 posted on 05/15/2005 2:16:55 PM PDT by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

bump later read


70 posted on 05/15/2005 2:20:43 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Hillary's Chappaquiddick. Check it out at: www.Hillcap.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Shakes head.


71 posted on 05/15/2005 2:21:10 PM PDT by hipaatwo (When you're in trouble you want all your friends around you...preferably armed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: bvw

You don't throw a lit flare into a sea of gasoline, which is exactly what Newsweek did -- KNOWINGLY.

They WANT to incite anti-US violence, they WANT the US to LOSE, never mind how many people get killed, just to try to make President Bush look bad.

Just because someone may or may not have told them something, they have no obligation to print it. And there were quite a few times recently that we saw reporters totally making up things to support their agenda.

Newsweek is indeed responsible for the violence that errupted, as a direct result of their allegations, presented as facts.


72 posted on 05/15/2005 2:21:25 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: awaken2spirit
Isakoff ought to be sent to Afghanistan to talk some sense into the Muslims.

As a lefty, he's from the school of thought that we can reason with those people.

Give him the opportunity to prove it:-)

73 posted on 05/15/2005 2:23:14 PM PDT by moondoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis
As I wrote on my blog.....

It wasn't like throwing gas on a fire, it was like tossing a propane tank into a fire and shooting it with both barrels of a shotgun loaded with 00 buck!!

It seems the Taliban has been trying to spread this rumor for sometime and when it got reported by a US mag.......stand back, this isn't going to be good.

74 posted on 05/15/2005 2:25:07 PM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theo
It may be true that if Newsweek hadn't printed this lie, people wouldn't have rioted. In that sense, Newsweek may share some of the blame, knowing that their words will affect such an odd group of people as ME Islamics.

But it was Islamics who killed people, in the name of their moongod, not Newsweek.

If we blame Newsweek, then it opens the door to blaming America for 911.

The archer bears responsibility for the arrows that he looses from his bow, so how is it that Newsweek is not directly responsible for the ripples produced from the stone it has tossed?

Put in another way, am I not responsible if I yell fire in a crowded theater and people are subsequently trampled to death?

75 posted on 05/15/2005 2:27:10 PM PDT by awaken2spirit (When one fornicates with ignorance, the result of that union is chaos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
In view of this confession, read THIS

I feel positively prophetic.

76 posted on 05/15/2005 2:28:27 PM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
It was certainly irresponsible of Newsweek, but I can't imagine they foresaw what would happen.

Has anyone seen actual coverage by Al-Jazeera et al. on the story. I would suspect the (hostile) Arab press coverage would have been more than a line or two somewhere in the article.

77 posted on 05/15/2005 2:29:07 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

fyi, this will make your blood boil


78 posted on 05/15/2005 2:32:45 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: awaken2spirit
The archer bears responsibility for the arrows that he looses from his bow, so how is it that Newsweek is not directly responsible for the ripples produced from the stone it has tossed?

Take as a given that both Newsweek and the rioters are in the wrong. I say the principle is "stick and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me."

Or using the toss a match into gasoline analogy ... how can one justify the pool of gasoline represented by the ready-to-rioters? A match is not a bad thing, per se, it takes both, the match and the gasoline to make havoc.

Put in another way, am I not responsible if I yell fire in a crowded theater and people are subsequently trampled to death?

Indeed. But are you responsible for your injuries if you walk up to a bully and tell him his mother wears army boots? Not saying it's smart to do so, just wondering if you are, or if the bully is responsible for the resulting injuries.

79 posted on 05/15/2005 2:42:09 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: All

There is NO crime in throwing a koran in a toilet. NONE. It is not illegal. It's un-pc, that's it.


80 posted on 05/15/2005 2:54:14 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson