Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pepsionice
When you look at the cost of running Eielson...its a ton of money. Between the heat bills and the operational cost...it'd make alot more sense to keep a base open down in Arizona, and base the unit there.

What do you suppose response time from Arizona would be?

Eielson is home to the 354th Fighter Wing. Other than a couple forward based F15s at Galena, its the primary defense base in Alaska. Move that south and Alaska is a sitting Duck for any N.Korean mischief.

If the fighters were to be moved off Eielson under realignment, all thats left is the 168th air refueling wing, a National Guard unit. They could theoretically be anywhere. However, they frequently refuel interdiction flights by the fighter wing, so they can't go far.

That's why Ted Stevens said:
"I think it is wrong to leave our area without fighter protection and it is wrong from a national security point of view because the access to our nation from that part of the world is across Alaska, so it is just not a good decision."

As for the heating costs, its, what, maybe 15 miles from the Alaska Pipeline?

11 posted on 05/14/2005 1:24:58 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: konaice

The pipeline runs through the base. They have their own powerplant that also produces heat for the base.


12 posted on 05/14/2005 1:56:39 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson