Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right
THe information is available. It's there. You choose not to see it. Compliance cost is a part of it, yes... but not all of it.

Separately, I would support the replacement of our income tax system with this consumption tax even if prices changed.

But the overall tax collection remains constant AND the tax base is made larger... they'll be more people paying tax.

If you have a pizza party with 18 people for $90, you could have 9 people pay $10 each. Alternatively, you could broaden the base and have 18 people pay $5 each.

If you really want to see what the remainder of costs that will be reduced or eliminated, do a simple search on google or here on FR. I'm not going to spend my time doing what you could do (but refuse).

771 posted on 05/20/2005 6:48:39 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 769 | View Replies ]


To: Principled
If you really want to see what the remainder of costs that will be reduced or eliminated, do a simple search on google or here on FR

I have searched and searched and I have provided all the details I have discovered. Why don't you show me where I am wrong if it is so easy to find out? If you can't back up your claims that prices will stay the same with real numbers under the fair tax, quit making it. I have shown what your total tax base is, and what kind of savings we need and what your plan will save. After 9 posts, still no answer. Do I need to reword the question?

773 posted on 05/20/2005 6:55:10 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies ]

To: Principled; Final Authority
But the overall tax collection remains constant AND the tax base is made larger... they'll be more people paying tax.

A larger tax base means more things are taxed not "they'll" be more people, because "they'll' won't be more people. The fairtax exempts some taxpaying businesses from the tax rolls (I thought the fairtax didn't like exemptions).

It's cheesy but it ain't a pizza party.

779 posted on 05/20/2005 7:14:16 AM PDT by lewislynn ( Is calling for energy independence a "protectionist" act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies ]

To: Principled; Always Right
THe information is available. It's there. You choose not to see it.
Ahhh, the classic reply from a FairTaxer!
781 posted on 05/20/2005 7:30:30 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson