he went on for 100 posts arguing that 100-22 = 88 - and based his entire argument on it.
I don't go on 100 posts on any one thing.
How is that different from your hero Ancient Geezer going on about how there's an "exclusive tax rate for income"?
Meaning there's an income tax rate that excludes the income it's supposed to tax...He even showed the numbers. The problem was he couldn't figure out how to exclude the income from the tax to make it work...more than once...go figure.
BTW, there's only one way anyone could know I once used different screen names ....I disclosed it.
You forgot to take your medication today I think. You're babbling nonsense again.
Semantics, here, looey ... actually your were caught doing it, accused of it, and finally admitted it.
"Disclosed" sort of implies you came up with the notion out of the blue - you didn't.