Okay, done deal. Admin, we got a guy here spamming JR's bandwidth with iterative posts of objects, links, etc. that he has posted before. Boy's a stone waste of bandwidth. Might have a look.
Been here since '98, still here inspite of all the protests of those who figure facts can be shut out by mere assertion without substance.
"Assertion without substance" is what you call everyone else's posts. "Facts" are what you call your own arguments, which are in fact pleas for changes in the law to suit yourself.
Okay, done deal. Admin, we got a guy here spamming JR's bandwidth with iterative posts of objects, links, etc. that he has posted before. Boy's a stone waste of bandwidth. Might have a look.
Yes Indeed, it may be worth a look through the whole thread. There is much to be learned here.
"Assertion without substance" is what you call everyone else's posts. "Facts" are what you call your own arguments,
Don't see a single substantiation for your assertions anywhere in this thread. Merely your statment and nothing more. That is assertion withut substance, and tooting your own horn.
which are in fact pleas for changes in the law to suit yourself.
All arguments are pleas for change to suit one's own views regarding a topic. Indeed that is all debate ever is. The key lay in does one remain totally inside one's own head and self assertion or does one demonstrate a body of knowledge, philosophy and logic outside ones personal assumptions that demonstrate independant basis and foundation outside the confines of ones own mis and pre-conseptions.
Thus far all you present is that which is a product of your own imagination with no foundational support whatsoever. One speaking ex-cathedra should at least have a credible claim to deity.