I consider your performance on this thread to be 75% pollution
“No one should be judge in his own case. ”
-- Publilius Syrus (~100 BC)
and 25% derivative argument from other people's websites.
NO just supporting data from many sources, too bad you have none isn't it.
I haven't detected much in the way of original thought, responsive genuine conversation, or original discourse or POV.
So why do you continue? You apparently know all the answers, obviously you need nothing from my input nor my support for whatever your agenda is.
I get the strongest impression, when reading your posts, that I'm not dealing with the head office here
Whoever told you were?
It is up to you to form your own opinions not to me or some head office to tell you what to think. I provide infomation, you draw your personal conclusions. That's the way it works.
If that seems harsh, so be it.
Not at all, just off the point and silly.
But you didn't show much mercy to the boards yourself, when you decided to back up your dump-truck load of spam.
You tack on to the end of a 1000+ reply thread on taxreform and look to change the discussion and expect to be taken seriously? Information on taxes and tax reform has been provided as an extension of the established thread topic, its up to you from there.
You obviously have your own fixed opinion of how the economy and the world works and do not appear intersted in reforming the tax system. That's fine, but the thread topic happens to be tax reform, not NAFTA, CAFTA and every other ill in the nation.
My interest is in reforming the tax system and the advantages to be gained thereby.
Your interest appears to be elsewhere. I suggest you post a thread and discussion of whatever it is you figure ought to be done rather than hijack a overly verbose thread already on tax reform to your interests.
International trade agreements and their effects are not my focus, tax reform is. If you want to talk about the best ways to go about reforming the tax system I'm here. You want to talk about all the other ills of government I've got my plate full as it is and not really interest in picking up a second banner nor putting down the one I have chosen to carry.
In any case I am leaving to take care of more immediate and for me more important concerns. So good day to you. If you want to discuss NAFTA CAFTA and other malicious trade agreements I suggest you post a thread where that can be focused on and attract those who's interest in such is greater than mine.
I asked you a question about your data -- yours is the onus, I don't need to "prove" anything. Like I said above, you want to change the tax code, onus yours. You are the guy who needs support.
You apparently know all the answers, obviously you need nothing from my input nor my support for whatever your agenda is.
I don't have an "agenda" -- you're the guy with the rented bullhorn.
You tack on to the end of a 1000+ reply thread on taxreform and look to change the discussion and expect to be taken seriously?
I asked you a question about some data you posted 500 posts back, and you get all defensive and evasive about it. Not my problem. You seem to misunderstand the transaction here.
My interest is in reforming the tax system and the advantages to be gained thereby. Your interest appears to be elsewhere.
Of course it is. I've no interest in shouldering your tax burden just so you can be rich. Or richer.
Have a nice day.