No need to cut and paste; the bias lies in the authors themselves as I have said (as well as the groups they work for). Shame you can't see it - but no surprise since you are one of the SQL bunch yourself.
I've read the paper and see little of merit in it. It's merely another economic model based upon the assumptions of those doing the modelling which (as pointed out) have a built-in bias. As do you.
Now - were is the bill for your "tax plan" ... and which congressmen back it? Or have you finally discovered it is unsupportable?
Shame you can't see itYeah, a real pity I don't see bias everywhere I look. Must be nice to be able to dismiss out of hand anything you don't like by just claiming bias. Must come in real handy (as we have seen).
It's merely another economic model based upon the assumptions of those doing the modelling which (as pointed out) have a built-in bias.LOL! It's not about an economic model! It's reviewing several models and trying to determine why they act differently. You never read the paper.
So those folks are "biased" but the FT advocates are pure as the driven snow? LoL