Hardly. And in your original hitpiece link posting, you might notice that at least two of the authors of the article(both CRS staffers) have reviewed their own models in the mix. One of these authors joins with a notorious opponent (Gale) of anything but the status quo and the test of models was done by the JCT.
Hardly what any reasonable person would call "unbiased".
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. None.