I've stated why they have a bias.You haven't even shown they have a bias and you are already stating why!
Go tell us how the JCT is not biased, either.I never said they weren't.
AND, BTW, show us a bill offering all the particulars of your Nightmare VAT/Flat tax you phony.There is a flat tax before Congress, S.812, but so what? It won't matter in the end.
You've said on prior threads that you don't support the current flat tax bills and yet you refuse to define what you do support other than a nebulous, theoretical concept of a Nightmare VAT/Nightmare Flat tax.
I've said these groups have a bias because they are dependent on staying on he gravy train of public funding. That much is clear in seeing the type and titles of the "research" they don (and I've studied some of their reports). If you're trying to convince anyone that these sorts of groups have no bias or political ax to grind you're not being very convincing.
With the JCT and other groups you've also never said they were biased, either. I can see you're merely trying again to sidetrack he thread and you now bring up a meaningless flat tax bill which you don't even support as we know.
These things and your "excise" ploy are merely more of your red herrings. People are not so foolish as you suppose to not realize the diversionary tactics.