Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit
That calculation has you calculating a tax on a tax. This makes my point even more pointed. The car costs 38,500 and you pay a 30% tax of 11500. Multipling the total price by the tax rate of 23% gives a tax on the car plus a tax on the tax. This is worse than I thought.
It's an iterative process unless you convert the inclusive rate to the exclusive rate.
$ 100.00
x 23%
=
$ 23.00
x 23%
=
$ 5.29
x 23%
=
$ 1.22
x 23%
=
$ 0.28
x 23%
=
$ 0.06
x 23%
=
$ 0.01
TOTAL
$ 129.87

1,175 posted on 05/24/2005 10:53:05 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1153 | View Replies ]


To: Your Nightmare

As I said it is worse than I thought. There is a mathematical fallacy involved in it which I haven't time to figure out at present.


1,183 posted on 05/24/2005 11:15:44 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1175 | View Replies ]

To: Your Nightmare

Depends on how you l;ook at it. The "price" of something is what you pay for it - including tax. Paying $50,000 in the one case or $129.87 in the other is merely lising the total price you pay.

The tax in either case is 23% t-i (or 29.97% t-e). It is the same amount of tax in either case for the particular item. Are you 6 feet tall or 72 inches tall??

Instead of the odd example you gave you could have just divided $100 by (1-0.23) which gives 29.97% directly. Same result. The amount you p[ay is the same also - $129.87 for your example.


1,186 posted on 05/24/2005 11:48:32 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson