Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: johnb838

>>Then I oppose marriage and I think it should be abolished. I propose an Abolition of Marriage Amendment. If it is going to include steers and queers, then there is no reason for a single fellow like me to subsidize it with my tax dollars. I grudgingly am ok with it between a man and a woman because I think it is good for society, but if society is going to champion something that I believe will contribute to its downfall, then lets get rid of it all together<<

All the state can do is decide what official recognition to give to marriage..people would still get married no matter what. I just don't see why we should not have something other than marriage for people who want to form a household together.


138 posted on 05/12/2005 3:30:56 PM PDT by paul_fromatlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: paul_fromatlanta

YEah, I think it should be a straight up partnership, almost like a business partnership. But no federal tax breaks. You can get a break if there are minor childern, but nothing just for being coupled. That sucks anyway.


140 posted on 05/12/2005 3:40:12 PM PDT by johnb838 (Free Republicans... To Arms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson