[jwalsh07]

"Before filing the lawsuit, the Thomas More Law Center sent a letter to school officials explaining Kevin Dibble’s First Amendment right to peacefully express his pro-life views on his clothing at school. The Law Center also pointed to the double standard of school officials not allowing Kevin’s message but allowing other students to wear controversial shirts that depict grotesque pictures and sexually charged messages. In response to the letter, school officials again denied Kevin his right to wear his shirt to school."

Got the picture? Kevin's message is being singled out because the principal doesn't agree with the message. Unconstitutional.

[Semper]

Kevin's message is being singled out because the principal doesn't agree with the message. Unconstitutional.

If that is the case it is indeed unconstitutional. The most appropriate action would then be to call for the end of the other displays. Two wrongs do not make a right.