Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
I realized decades ago that I was not among those blessed with the ability to reconstruct a millions-year-old critter from the fossil remains of a clipped toenail.
Still, there are some easier concepts I can master quite well, thank you very much.

So, is it just me? or does the "out-of-Africa" speculations seem now to have been a bit premature?
Even the "fertile crescent" history I was taught as a youngster seems to me sillier and sillier with each new discovery.

14,000-year old South American settlements?

5 posted on 05/11/2005 12:47:01 PM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961
14,000-year old South American settlements?

Well, that ain't in the Bible!
7 posted on 05/11/2005 12:52:38 PM PDT by Vladiator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961
"14,000-year old South American settlements?"

How about 50,000 years old in South Carolina, Topper.

That still doesn't change the 'out-of-Africa' theory.

10 posted on 05/11/2005 2:10:18 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson