To: Physicist; JBW; thejokker
If we didn't need Wal-Mart at all, but were magically able to buy directly from each of Wal-Mart's suppliers, would it be better or worse for the economy?Nicely put. This post reminds me of the friend who advocated that it wasn't right for any employer not to pay for all employee's health insurance. My question was, "do you pay for anyone else's health insurance? Do you have any intention of hiring anyone else?"
Her answer was no - but she still thought it was her business to demand that others bear burdens that she wouldn't touch with her little finger. Sigh . . . some Christians are like that!
11 posted on
05/11/2005 5:39:35 AM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Well, no. Wal-Mart did a lot of work to find it's suppliers. we would get stuck paying that cost if we went hunting ourselves.
18 posted on
05/11/2005 6:04:02 AM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(M. Moore + MoveOn.org = MooreOn.Org)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson