Trendy pseudo-scientific ad hoc garbage. They're desperately trying to mathematically model biological phenomena, most often with little success.
Further, even if biologists can't do math, does it mean they can't do biology?
It means biology is a soft science that should not be taken seriously. If you don't understand mathematics than whatever you understand is only at the level of theology anyway.
It's nice to know that I write software that control spacecraft with ... theology.
Or is that witchcraft?
I've always been math challenged. I can get completly lost trying to understand graphic transformations that only have 10 variables or so. But I can keep the structure and varable list in my head of 20k lines of code.
Eh? On what planet? Biological mathematics is very well established, heavy into discrete disciplines, linear algebra and calculus, and has an enviable, well-established predictive track record. It hasn't been reasonable to call it a "soft science" for at least 40 years. Are you under the impression that pure math hasn't got it's byways and alleys where we deal with failures, natural limits of analysis, and groping around in the dark, unaided by provably formal demonstrations?
Gosh another area where you demonstrate abject ignorance. Somehow that does not surprise me.
It means biology is a soft science that should not be taken seriously. If you don't understand mathematics than whatever you understand is only at the level of theology anyway.
Thanks for demonstrating that you have shit for brains as well as a maladjusted personality.