Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vetvetdoug

Good points. Why is the dog owner considered negligent for the dog running loose, but the cat owner is not also considered negligent for the same thing? If she wanted to properly protect her cat from loose dogs, she should have a fenced in yard. What would she have done if a racoon or skunk killed her cat?


95 posted on 05/09/2005 12:42:03 PM PDT by CSM ( If the government has taken your money, it has fulfilled its Social Security promises. (dufekin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: CSM

Pepe Le Peu would have to go to court.


105 posted on 05/09/2005 1:32:54 PM PDT by DLfromthedesert (Texas Cowboy...you da man!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: CSM; vetvetdoug
Why is the dog owner considered negligent for the dog running loose, but the cat owner is not also considered negligent for the same thing?

Per the article, the cat was in its own yard. The dog repeatedly got loose and got into the cat owner's yard. If they both were running loose, I'd agree with you, but it does not seem that was the case.

121 posted on 05/10/2005 4:49:32 AM PDT by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson