Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maceman
I think she earned that 6% very fairly.

Maybe, but consider the case in the DC area, where there's such a demand for housing that properties sell the day they're listed. Do the selling and buying agents each deserve a legally-mandated 3% for that, or should market pressures be allowed to determine the price through competition?

3 posted on 05/09/2005 5:11:54 AM PDT by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom
legally mandated!? What if i wanted to offer a service to potential buyers and sellers where I only wanted 1% (I an upstart and I was willing to sacrifice higher percentage commissions for more volume in order to nab some market share.) If it was legally mandated, I'd have to offer a kickback after the transaction and call it a gift. Does making law to mandate a certain amount of sales commission sound like a genuinely good idea to you?
9 posted on 05/09/2005 5:21:40 AM PDT by LowCountryJoe (50 states, and their various laws, will serve 'we, the people' better than just one LARGE state can)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom
Do the selling and buying agents each deserve a legally-mandated 3% for that, or should market pressures be allowed to determine the price through competition?

And you've worked on a commission basis for how long? First, by law commissions (at least in our state) are negotiable. Market pressure from discount brokers has reduced the average commission over the past few years.

The agents portion of the earnings varies by indivual ageement with the employing broker, and probably averages out to a 50/50 split.

One company used to bill itself as the two percent commission company, but if you wanted MLS (cooperative marketing)exposure the rate was over 4%. Now they promote a 3% program with MLS participation, but there's a catch. They offer out 1% to the co-broker. The typical payout in our market is 2.5%, so agents avoid showing their listings unless there are no options, or show them last. Needless to say, a high percentage of their listings expire unsold.

Compare a Realtor at 6% to an attorney on contingency at 33% plus expenses. If either fails to perform there is no paycheck. Should we limit lawyers' charges too?

Bottom line is, most agents earn their pay by doing better for the client than theclient can do for himself.

43 posted on 05/09/2005 7:04:33 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom
Do the selling and buying agents each deserve a legally-mandated 3% for that

When I sold my house in Florida I negotiated 4%. Since when is 6% legally-mandated?

63 posted on 05/09/2005 7:28:00 AM PDT by killjoy (Real Men Love Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom
If you use a realtor in Falls Church, VA, you are an idiot.

A settlement atty. will ask $500 bucks, hang a sign on your house, FSBO, 750k, someone will pay you a million for it before the sun sets.

What, exactly, is the realtor for?

I wanna pay them $60k to hang the sign?

127 posted on 05/09/2005 7:09:13 PM PDT by patton ("Fool," said my Muse to me, "look in thy heart, and write.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson