[ClancyJ]

Whatever the disagreements over different parts of this case, we all have seen that now the state will require the death of one they judge to be in a particular medical situation (even with differences of opinion) and that no matter who wants to care for that patient, they will kill it.

And, do any of you think this is a "good thing"?

I just don't think the state/government has the right to tell me a relative has to die because of ..............

[billbears]

I just don't think the state/government has the right to tell me a relative has to die kept alive beyond all reason even if I knew their wishes were to be allowed to die because those with good intentions, albeit misguided, handed this issue over to the national government based on emotion.............

[billbears]

and that no matter who wants to care for that patient, they will kill it.

And I'm not sure handing this patient over to people that would keep this person alive, even if they knew the patient's wish was to die just out of selfishness and the deluded joy they receive from keeping the patient alive at all costs