[staterightsfirst]

ID in the bioE field is repeatable, observable and testable.

Ah. How do I disprove intelligent design again? Because, you know, like I said, you can't, which means it's not a scientific pursuit.

I won't argue ID on scientific terms because it's not science. I've even asked you to define the theory of intelligent design. You haven't. I previously asked you to tell me how to disprove the theory of intelligent design. You didn't.

Intelligent design theory is not science.

[jwalsh07]

You need to put down the bong. You didn't ask me any such thing. For the record, I have no investment in ID, evolution or exploding grapefruits that expand into a universe. I simply enjoy a few laughs watching otherwise intelligent folks put on their dunce hats once in a while. Intelligent design is here to stay chief. Dawkins, though a religious bigot, is at least honest and smart enough to know it.

Whether you care to acknowledge it or not is of little concern in my day to day trudge through Universe Grapefruit.