[dannyboy72]

"...Most Darwinists are Christians."

Darwin's Evolutionary Theory is just that, a theory. A theory is an idea which has yet to be proven through accepted factual data. Hence, it requires the proponent to have faith that the theory is true. Faith requires belief. Belief that evolution is true. Hence, the devotees of the theory of evolution can be characterized as believers of the religion of evolution.

While I do believe that species can evolve, I would characterize it more as adapting to environmental condition. Different species were created (or relocated) on this planet and then we adapted to its ever changing environmental conditions.

Want to prove Darwinism is a religion and not fact? Ask your science teacher 'what color are humans supposed to be?'. Did we evolve into a white being and then our skin tone gradually changed to black because of the sun or were we all black and gradually our skin lightened up because of a lack of the sun? And what accounts for Asian traits? The Darwin theory dictates we evolved and then changed skin color based on conditions. So according to Darwin, one of the races is superior to the others because that race was the first and original evolution of the human species.

So Darwinism is a racist religion, not just a theory. Just what I believe. I call it the Dannyboy Theory and I think it should be taught in our schools.

[Jeff Gordon]

A theory is an idea which has yet to be proven through accepted factual data. Hence, it requires the proponent to have faith that the theory is true.

You are thinking like a creationist. A theory is not a truth. A theory is an idea which has been or will be tested in various ways. And that is the problem with creationism. One can not devise a test for it.

[orionblamblam]

> So according to Darwin, one of the races is superior to the others because that race was the first and original evolution of the human species.

That takes the cake for just about the dumbest thing ever said about evolution. Bravo.

[Bluchers Elephant]

I'm just going to follow your argument to its logical conclusion.
the race that represents the original skin colour for homo sapiens is superior because it was the came before the others. so the earlier members of our genus must be superior to us. strange that I'm not seeing many of the obviously superior members of Homo Neanderthalis or Homo Erectus wandering round.