[jwalsh07]

Right, whatever you say. You haven't replied to one argument I've made, be it your constitutional illiteracy or the "fact" that intelligent design happens daily in our lives.

But you're pretty good at "declaring victory".

[staterightsfirst]

You haven't replied to one argument I've made

For the last time, you can't argue ID on a scientific basis because it's not science, because it can't be disproven.

Would you like me to write in larger text?

[staterightsfirst]

Oh, oh, okay, I see what happened here.

constitutional illiteracy

What does this have to do with intelligent design?

the "fact" that intelligent design happens daily in our lives

Were we not talking about non-human (i.e. GOD intelligent design?) Because that's usually the case. BTW, if we were, calling it a scientific "fact" is insane, since how do you detect the difference between a random occurance and something God did?