Posted on 05/06/2005 10:47:50 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon
Flattery will get you everywhere, skippy.
Though, I should have put a smiley or something in my post to you, I actually meant it as a joke. Just a gaff! Just a lighthearted poke!
I apologize.
When do they start challenging other scientific theories like relativity, flight, gravity, thermodynamics, etc.?
Time should be set aside in physics class to teach the theory of the aether.
Any theory? What constitutes a valid theory?
Ll is the lawyer gene for diploids. You got the dominant allele.
Very funny. You can't keep straight in your evolved head who you've said what to and I've been beaten. I'll have to remember never to debate folks with neuronal dysfunction. You can't win.
BTW, if the state has rights that come first, where does that leave the indivdual? The Gulag?
Yeah, you were beaten. Does this mean you want to keep dancing? Maybe try making an argument instead of hurling insults.
You can start with telling me how to disprove intelligent design.
You mean, most Darwinists "call" themselves Christians.
I don't believe the allegorical nature of the Bible was being discussed here.
Evolution is not a fact, it is a belief system, a cult -- at least to the degree it was taken by Gould and alcolytes. As a framework for classification, it's fine -- but it is taken too far. Greedy beyond its meets and bounds.
Were you around at the time to know for certain that Creationism is a lie? Who is doing the sinning now?
> most Darwinists "call" themselves Christians
Most Christians "call" themselves Christians.
> Were you around at the time to know for certain that Creationism is a lie?
Ah, an interesting notion. By that logic, the past is unknowable. Any claim about the past is equally valid. We should disband the legal system, since it is based on examination of evidence of things past that often times was not directly observed.
You sure are off in your own little world, but for once I agree. The past is 100% unknowable and anyone who claims to "know the truth of the past" is lying. BTW = the legal system I know personally for over 20 years - it should be based more on biblical principles rather than human opinion and ideology. 2nd time today that I agree with you. I need a stiff drink!
> anyone who claims to "know the truth of the past" is lying
So you agree that Creationists are a pack of liars. And you further believe that anyone who claims to 'know" that Jesus actually walked the Earth and died for your sins is also a liar.
> The past is 100% unknowable
How sad for you. Perhaps you should look into Last Thursdayism. I think you would get along well with it.
But you're pretty good at "declaring victory".
But then again so was Baghdad Bob so you're in damn good company.
For the last time, you can't argue ID on a scientific basis because it's not science, because it can't be disproven.
Would you like me to write in larger text?
Heh, sure, demonize me if you want - I guess it makes your ineptitude easier to accept.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.