Ohh, so I'm a Nazi because I supposedly defend them. Look who thinks he's "clever Dan". So yeah, I'm still not going to back down because you're associating me with Nazis, horrifically negative connotation as it may be... That's about the oldest trick in the book. =/
Yes, statements like that show a lack of competence for arguments about military history. Incendiary devices are for melting military equipment. I've used them.
Okay, you're going to make me look up everything, aren't you? Anyway, no. An incendiary device is a very general category. If you bother to look it up, though, you'll see that "incendiary device" always seems to refer to "firebombs." This Geneva convention refers to "incendiary weapon" as "any weapon or munition which is primarily designed to set fire to objects or to cause burn injury to persons through the action of flame, heat, or combination thereof, produced by a chemical reaction of a substance delivered on the target." But no, you're talking about incendiary "devices", right? Whatever. I don't know what you're ever talking about. You may just want to stick with calling people Nazis.
And your leftist, hate-America attitude was obvious enough before that comment, when you were only helping your associate, PzGr43, at promoting the anti-American, neo-Nazi Dresden canard.
And you're the human equivalent of my ears ringing. Plz stop saying "canard" and plz stop saying completely unrelated things about people and plz learn the meaning of "drivel" so you can avoid it.