Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: K4Harty
The P.M. is the elected leader of the party with a Parliamentary majority. If his caucus elected a new leader, the new guy would be the PM.

Blair and his Chancellor of the Exchequer have an unusual relationship. When Blair ran for the party leadership, Brown agreed not to run and to support Tony. In exchange, Tony promised to make Brown Chancellor (#2 in power in the Cabinet), to give him extraordinary powers and eventually to retire and pass the leadership over to Brown.

The conventional wisdom is that if Labour wins convincingly Blair will serve most of the term and then turn it over to Brown. But if the win is narrow or there is a loss that Blair would turn it over to Brown soon.

Remember, this is a country where people talk about the Constitution, but nothing is actually written down. :-)

21 posted on 05/05/2005 2:22:51 PM PDT by colorado tanker (The People Have Spoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker

in other words in Parliamentary democracies you can mutiny against your own leader any time really, you don't have to wait until a convention every four years.....

Martin in Canada forced Chretien to retire sooner than he wanted to......in other words we get PMs we the people didn't necessarily vote for...we have to wait until the next national election to affirm or reject that new PM


56 posted on 05/05/2005 3:32:35 PM PDT by littlelilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson