Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Modernman
You assume that reptiles are somehow "more evolved" than fish. In the highly unlikely case that a reptile evolved into a fish, that process would still fall under evolution

Ok, but if one species evolved to two would it be dilution?

77 posted on 05/04/2005 1:43:38 PM PDT by 70times7 (An open mind is a cesspool of thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: 70times7
Ok, but if one species evolved to two would it be dilution?

No, it would be brnaching.

Months ago, someone else suggested that one species branching into two seperate species was somehow evidence against evolution. I don't remember the argument, though, because it simply didn't make any sense.
81 posted on 05/04/2005 1:46:41 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson