Replies

[ But I eagerly anticipate your attempt to spin this into some situation where Matchett-PI did no wrong by lying about the words of another. ]

Why should I do that.?.. Matchett can defend himself fully..
Can only hope to read the chicken plucking your gonna git..
This is fun...

Oh! I suspect the clucking and plucking and down right ducking from cogent analysis will be classic free republic drama.. Found no where else on the internet I might add.. this good..

I'm a just water boy in Matchetts-PI's corner..

Why should I do that.?.. Matchett can defend himself fully..

And he did so quite eloquently, by reiterating a claim that had already been proven false. Which means that there could be no doubt with an assumption that Matchett-PI might have been mistaken. No, with his arrogant response, he proved to all that he was just lying.

Can only hope to read the chicken plucking your gonna git..

And why am I going to be 'gitting' a 'chicken plucking'? Because I expose someone's blatant lies?

I'm a just water boy in Matchetts-PI's corner..

Yes, you're one lying creationist defending another. Hardly surprising. It's so rare for one creationist to ever admonish another for outright lying, no matter how obvious it is, and since you're as much of a liar as Matchett-PI, there's no chance that you'd risk accusations of hypocracy in addition to dishonesty.