To: bkepley
Don't these things just about always turn out to be fakes?
No. The extremely rare cases of fakery just end up getting a lot more coverage by creationists who tout one fake (that usually was never taken that seriously by real scientists in the first place) amongst thousands of legitimate finds as "proof" that evolution is all nothing but a fraud.
19 posted on
05/04/2005 12:55:24 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
And why wouldn't other scientists take them seriously? How many scientists have actually examined these new-found fossils? And, by the way, when were they discovered? You have a way of typing before you think. Don't be so quick to write off everyone who doesn't follow your line of thinking. That isn't how a true scientist should behave. Making up your mind before examining facts is not exactly the scientific method now, is it?
38 posted on
05/04/2005 1:14:11 PM PDT by
mlc9852
To: Dimensio
[ No. The extremely rare cases of fakery just end up getting a lot more coverage by creationists ]
How come the fakes are almost never found by Evos.?.
and then are not considered fake until some Evo has a spate of conscience and finally says, "OH ALL RIGHTY THEN"...
88 posted on
05/04/2005 1:52:19 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson