[Robert_Paulson2]

They have stained the military.

---

baloney.
they gave us a good laugh.
and should be rewarded.

panties to their heads. that's what I say.
maybe you need a pair too.

how appropriate.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"baloney.
they gave us a good laugh.
and should be rewarded.

panties to their heads. that's what I say.
maybe you need a pair too.

how appropriate."

The only people who got a good laugh were depraved S.O.B.'s.
And if you could read, you would know that what happened was a lot worse than panties to the head (sodomy, rape). But that's all OK to you. You don't believe that war is moral, so why should our soldiers show any decency? ANYTHING is OK to you. You ignore the FACT that many of the people being held at the prison were of UNDETERMINED status. Many were later let go because they were civilians caught up in the sweep. But that's OK to you; our soldiers have no need for restraint, because war is immoral.

You used the examples before of Hiroshima and Dresden; they are COMPLETELY different. They had some legitimate military purpose. What these perverts did at this prison had nothing to do with any military objective. It was done for one reason only; they were sick individuals who were in a position of power. They disobeyed orders. They have no business being in our military. Even though they are a tiny minority of our soldiers, they have made it harder to get the support we need to fight the terrorists.

But what do you care? To you war is immoral. That statement alone disqualifies you from giving any serious commentary about this case.