Replies

To suggest that all Muslims are Atta's is a blatantly ignorant statement. Its some what akin to saying all Christians are Crusaders or Jim Jones. And if you want to select a few verses of the Koran to prove the violent nature of their religion, why don't we just post a few verses from the book of Joshua to prove the violence of Christianity? My point is simply this, religions are composed of men, it is the character and integrity of the MAN being selected for the judicial spot that should be reviewed, not his religious affiliation.

While it may well be true that not all Muslims are terrorists, it has been amply documented that thus far in the War on Terror, all TERRORISTS have turned out to be MUSLIMS.

"Just the facts mam, just the facts"
-- Joe Friday

Nothing you said changes the fact that the character of the man must be evaluated not his religious affiliation. It does not matter if 99 out of 100 are bad (hypothetically speaking here I am not stating I believe 99 out of 100 Muslims are terrorists). If we judge that one honorable person by the deeds of the 99 dishonorable, we have committed an injustice to that man. This is the bedrock of our legal system, I am actually stunned that so many people seem to apply this concept to every other facet of their lives except for their view on Muslims